Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Animal Research

This is an excerpt from the paper...

Strong arguments are made for and against the use of animals in medical research. Both sides are quite persuasive on a number of points and it is extremely difficult to say that either side is entirely right or wrong. Those against animal research make strong points about the excessive, pointlessly inhumane, and sometimes unnecessary use of animals, their terrible suffering, and the need to look for alternative methods. They are less convincing in their claim that animals do not serve as adequate vehicles for useful testing or that the past record of achievements employing animal testing is unimpressive. Those who favor the use of animals in research point to a record of achievement that has benefited humanity and are convincing in arguing that animals continue to be useful. But they cannot successfully defend the treatment of animals in terms of quality of life or the infliction of sometimes unnecessary suffering. The best solution is to develop guidelines that do not forbid the use of animals but insist on humane treatment, curtailing waste, sound justifications, eliminating unnecessary suffering, and commitment to developing alternatives to animal research.

Barnard and Kaufman argue against animal testing, basing their case on the claim that such experiments "are poorly suited to addressing the urgent health problems of our era" and "can often mislead researchers or even contribute to illnesses or deaths by failing to predict toxic effects of drugs" (80). But, de

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Peter Singer, , Barnard Kaufman, Botting Morrison, Kaufman Mukerjee, American Feb, animal research, animal testing, barnard kaufman, Scientific American, scientific american feb, american feb 1997, Animal Research, american feb, scientific american, principal argument, feb 1997, sometimes unnecessary, easily refuted, alternative methods,
Approximate Word count = 1013
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$