Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Multiple Intelligence Theory and Learning Outcomes

This is an excerpt from the paper...

An Investigation of Multiple Intelligence Theory and its Application to Student Learning Outcomes in a

Any number of methods have been developed by music educators to provide students at different skill levels with personally targeted instruction within the context of theory-driven education (Runfola & Taggart, 2006). Educators working in this field have searched for answers to the questions of how students of varying ages learn when they learn music. Runfola and Taggart (2006) suggest that learning music is, in some key ways, similar to acquiring simultaneously both a new language and a new set of motor skills which must be integrated into a cohesive performance. These same researchers have also noted that students who pursue the development of musical ability are not a homogeneous group and are likely to bring their own personal learning styles to the instructional encounter; consequently, while there are any number of methods that are used to teach music, there is no single "best method" that meets the needs of all music students.

One music instruction strategy that has proven successful in meeting the needs of a variety of diverse student groups is the Suzuki Method. Suzuki (1973, 1983) noted that the Suzuki Piano Method represents a pedagogical sequence that encourages the development of musical literacy. This particular sequence moves from an emphasis on listening to music gradually to an actual engagemen

. . .
lodies, rhythms, and so forth which culminates in the ability to successfully reproduce a piece of music (Suzuki, 1982). In essence, Suzuki (1983) began to apply the methods of mother tongue learning in the service of music education. Beginning with his own instrument, the violin, Suzuki (1983) joined with other musicians and gradually expanded the Suzuki Method to include other instruments. The Suzuki Association of America (2005) has reported that the basic foundation of the method has been incorporated into other fields of study with success. The literature supporting Gardner's (1993) theory of MI is both broad and deep. Armstrong (1993) commented that a large body of empirical evidence supports the existence of these different ways of being intelligent or being smart. The theory of MI, said Armstrong (1993), is supported by research from such fields as anthropology, cognitive and developmental psychology, psychometrics, and neuroanatomy. Each intelligence, said Armstrong (1993), has its own developmental history and emerges at a certain point in childhood, has periods of potential blossoming during the lifespan and contains its own unique pattern of either gradual or rapid decline as a person ages. Interestingly
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Suzuki Method, Howard Gardner, Susan Kenney, Consequently Gardner, Musical Intelligence, Miranda Hughes, Dr Suzuki, Bloom Taxonomy, MI Gardner, Education Sai-no-Kyoiku, suzuki method, piano instruction, multiple intelligences, gardner 1993, suzuki piano, mi theory, method piano, suzuki method piano, musical intelligence, learning styles, suzuki 1978, method piano instruction, suzuki piano instruction, strong musical intelligence, success suzuki method,
Approximate Word count = 9629
Approximate Pages = 39 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$