Administration of Justice Privilege
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Although most of the lay public tend to believe that a hearing before a judge is fair and impartial, this often is not the case. The truth of the situation is difficult to quantify, but still requires exposition. Each judge runs his or her court as a personal fiefdom. We take for granted that the generalities of law should follow in each court as a standard repertoire. This is not always so. A given judge can bring his or her own prejudice or opinion to any case, allow or disallow testimony or evidence, misrepresent the letter of the law simply because that is his or her way of doing things. We only have to remember the difficulties that Judge Ito experienced in the trial of O.J. Simpson to understand this to be true. Many of the dramatic episodes that were played out in Judge Ito=s court would not have been allowed in another judges court. The application of judicial privilege is like saying that personality defines the governance and fairness of a trial. The time for judicial privilege has passed. At the very least, new rules and procedures need to be in place to correct the imbalances that will inevitably occur. There is in the United States a time honored tradition of championing an independent court. In a close reading of the Federalist Papers No. 81 a strong case is made to the people of a new nation that the judiciary needs to stand apart from the oth
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Papers No*1, Inquiry Board, Passed Introduction, District Columbia, Lee Corp, AThe Board, Judges Governor, Judge Ito=s, County Comm'rs, Ill Mar, judicial privilege, inquiry board, federalist papers 81, inc sara lee, board 1998, letter law, sara lee, lee corp, attorneyclient privilege, protected attorneyclient, diversey holdings inc, holdings inc sara, diversey holdings, sara lee corp, holdings inc,
Approximate Word count = 977
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Administration of Justice Privilege
|