A Personal Political Ideology
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Efforts on the part of political analysts to neatly categorize individuals as either liberal or conservative with respect to their political postures are often frustrated by the fact that many people are not consistent in their views on disparate issues. James Q. Wilson and John J. DiIulio (2004), in their discussion of political ideology, state that when the label of "liberal" or "conservative" is used, the implication is that an individual possesses and acts upon a patterned set of beliefs about how government and other institutions operate and in particular about the kinds of policies they ought to pursue. While these and other terms that denote a particular political ideology (e.g., radical, socialist, libertarian, or communist) are used with great regularity, Wilson and DiIulio (2004) make the point that many individuals hold radically different views which can be liberal, conservative, or representative of another ideology when different issues are at work. In this brief essay, I will present answers to three questions which help to identify my own political attitudes. The first question requires me to identify myself as a liberal, conservative, or something in between. From my own personal perspective, I would define myself as a libertarian. On social issues, I tend to be liberal, whereas on economic issues I tend to be conservative. Wilson and DiIulio (2004) generally define a liberal as an individual who tends to favor a w
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Wilson DiIulio, John DiIulio, Islam Christianity, Ideology Efforts, diiulio 2004, wilson diiulio 2004, wilson diiulio, political ideology, liberal conservative, free market, government involvement, DiIulio JJ, Houghton Mifflin, affairs wilson diiulio, individual choice economic, discussion political, choice economic affairs, rulers ought, economic issues, ought pursue, diiulio 2004 define,
Approximate Word count = 1115
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)
|