Constructivisn: Foucault and Goffman

In contrast, Michael Foucault preferred to analyze the entire society. He examined the ways in which societies operated and the principles of exclusion societies developed to define themselves through the writings of the time. Foucault did not conduct the type of first-hand and intensive field work characteristic of the development of Goffman's theories. Foucault's theories on history and the self were more impersonal and global in focus. They centered on how societies interpreted and implemented their definitions of sane and insane, innocent and criminal, and insider and outsider.

Goffman looks at the way individuals present themselves and their activities to others, using the theater as a framework. In his theory of impression management, Goffman

. . .
ons were affected. The shift from imprisonment and torture of the insane and criminal to the modern code of laws, separate mental facilities for the insane, and a new system of punishment developed for the criminal is an example of this shift (23). Another difference between Goffman and Foucault is the method by which they developed their theories. Goffman carefully observed and demonstrated through a substantial body of research and study the basis for his presentation of the self in everyday life and how the use of the theater model evolved. It is Goffman's view that individuals, from their smallest basic interactions up to the largest from the society. By comparison, Foucault did not conduct research directly. He was primarily a cultural historian and relied on the written work which was available to develop his theories. In his view, it is how societies, as large groups and not individuals, viewed and comprehended their world that defined the culture and governed the ways in which the society distributed and used power. Faucault traced the changing use of power against the most excluded groups as an indication of how a society defined itself. Works Cited Foucault, M. Discipline & Punish: Th
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Michael Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu's, Sociological Theory, Middle Ages, Forms Capital, Goffman Foucault, Pierre Bourdieu, Erving Goffman, Throughout Goffman, According Bourdieu, cultural capital, presentation self, habitus theory, sociological theory, everyday life, self everyday, presentation self everyday, self everyday life, individuals themselves, life york doubleday, mental hospitals, goffman developed, middle ages, everyday life york, york doubleday 1959,
Approximate Word count = 1651
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)