The international Debt Crisis
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Economists disagree as to why the international debt crisis has gone on for so long. It is still going strong after nearly a decade; debtors' solvency problems are manifest and the drag on economic growth caused by a large external debt is indisputable. The historical record indicates that this is the first massive international debt crisis in which the bulk of the claims are held by commercial banks. A burgeoning body of literature discussing the problem has focused on several different aspects of the negotiations between creditor banks, creditor countries and debtor countries. Each of the different analyses emphasize the active role of commercial banks in exacerbating the crisis and the potential of the same banks to find a solution. One viewpoint, for example, is that more often than not negotiations between creditor banks and debtor countries have emphasized incentive effects of immediate debt relief. This incentive/relief analysis states that debt reduction would be in the best interest of all parties involved, as the gains from the adjustment effort promoted by immediate relief would outweigh the costs of reducing the face value of the debt. This perspective suggests that offering relief to the debtors can improve the value of creditors claims and enhance repayment prospects. Another viewpoint highlights the ability of governments and international agencies to regulate and manage international financial exchanges. Still another viewpoint, which has become increasingly
. . .
operation. Within a few days of Mexico's announcement, the United States sent $2 billion in prepayments for future Mexican exports. The major creditor banks agreed to postpone debt service fees for several months while Mexico reorganized its finances. The United States convinced a commercial banking consortium to extend an additional $1 billion in emergency debt relief to Mexico.
Finally, the World Bank and IMF renegotiated Mexico's debt service schedules for a longer-term arrangement. In exchange for nearly $4 billion in IMF credits, the Mexican government agreed to impose a number of domestic economic policies pre-approved by the international agency. These policies comprised various austerity measures that focused on reducing the budget deficit, curtailing public borrowing, eliminating public works projects, and slashing social services, welfare and even public education programs (Wesson, 1988, p. 53). The austerity program was so strict that Mexico quickly achieved a surplus current account balance that was used to pay off its debt. Mexico went from a $7 billion current account deficit in 1982 at the height of the crisis to a $5 billion surplus the following year. The surplus, of course, was largely extracted to pay internat
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Latin America, Brazil Argentina, Latin American, Mexico Argentina, Bank IMF, Third World, , Monetary Fund, Dissent Mexico, Brazil IMF, latin america, debt crisis, brazil argentina, external debt, latin american, international debt, international financial, international debt crisis, debt relief, debtor countries, latin american countries, financial community, international financial community, de la madrid, president de la,
Approximate Word count = 7578
Approximate Pages = 30 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The international Debt Crisis
|