William Lederer's A Nation of Sheep

One of the glaring examples that Lederer provides of the U.S. government's persuasive powers is its near invasion of Laos during the summer of 1959. The government and the media were duped by the Laotian government into believing that foreign Communist troops had invaded its northern border. The Laotians, fearful that the U.S. was preparing to reduce foreign aid, fabricated the whole story using American diplomatic channels and the American press to spread the news. These rumors took on a life of their own as senior U.S. officials corroborated the story, despite the fact that there were no U.S. eyewitnesses to the invasion: "The truth is that the U.S. government was in almost total ignorance of the facts" (Lederer, 1961, p. 25). The deception was discovered months later, when U.S. journalists and a United Nations team finally visited the area where the "invasion" occurred.

How was the U.S. government able to influence American public opinion based on such haphazard information? The government had

. . .
nformation personally relevant, and thus was susceptible to statements that supported its own beliefs about the Communist threat in the area: "[people] are extremely resistant to positions that differ even slightly from their own, no matter what side of the issue they have chosen" (Brewer and Crano, 1994, p. 65). This concept is defined as an entity's latitude of acceptance. Once an entity has made up its mind about an issue, negative appeals are useless. For example, the U.S. government should have been suspicious that the first announcements of the "invasion" of Laos came from Communist broadcasts. This did not, however, arouse suspicion because the U.S. was so thoroughly committed to its position. In fact, the U.S. probably developed counter-arguments to any sources that sought to disprove the veracity of reports on the Communist invasion. This resistance to pre-set attitudes has been demonstrated countless times in social psychology research: "In a classic 1979 study on persuasion at Stanford University, people for or against capital punishment listened to forceful arguments on both sides of the issue. If the argument was in conflict with their own position, their response was not to change, but to discredit, the per
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Brewer Crano, Nation Sheep, Janis Kelley, Kegley Wittkopf, Evening Lederer, Legions America's, Commerce Treasury, William Lederer, Laos Communist, Japan Social, foreign policy, lederer 1961, brewer crano 1994, nation sheep, crano 1994, brewer crano, foreign affairs, foreign issues, laotian government, american public, wittkopf 1993, st martin's press, kegley wittkopf 1993, hovland janis kelley, appeal negative appeal,
Approximate Word count = 1566
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)