Controlling Criminal Behavior

Indeed, the American penal reform movement is at least as old as the country. At the time of the Revolution, the main societal controls designed to control and punish criminal activities in use in the colonies were those that had historically been in use in England since at least the sixteenth century: the gallows, whipping post, stocks, and pillory. According to Pillsbury (1989), these structures "had stood at the center of American towns and villages throughout the colonial era [and] were massive structures, built in urban and rural areas, designed for the collective incarceration and reform of a region's criminals" (p. 729).

The establishment of the first penitentiaries paralleled the birth of the new nation in the period between 1790 and 1815, and resulted from a legislative shift away from mere corporal punishment to incarceration

. . .
me is demonstrated by recidivism rates which have not fallen (Gendreau and Paparozzi, 1995, p. 28). Similarly, efforts to create new punishments and treatments as alternatives to confinement have not done much to alter criminal activity. One method employed in the 1980s designed to correct juvenile offenders was the establishment of so-called "boot camps" in which paramilitary humiliation was employed. Inmates were "compelled to rise at dawn, eat meals in silence, [and] speak only when spoken to," and the rest of the day was filled with "menial labor": swabbing floors, marching in formation, whacking weeds, painting walls (Kane, 1989, p. 17). Community release programs have not fared much better. Probation and parole officials find themselves inundated with individual case loads in the hundreds. While this is certainly cost effective, it results in offender supervision which is, at best, minimal. Left unsupervised and untreated, recidivism runs high. In the wake of the "reforms" of the 1960s and 1970s, the pendulum has swung back in the direction of lengthy prison terms. Pillsbury (1989) describes this focus as being almost entirely on criminal threats and has inspired an explicit crime control ideology which
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Gendreau Paparozzi, According Pillsbury, , Hagan King, Indeed American, Vander Zanden, Kane J, pillsbury 1989, Gendreau Andrews, gendreau paparozzi, Comparative Criminology, Law Criminology, gendreau paparozzi 1995, paparozzi 1995, penal reform, criminal behavior, crime control, pillsbury 1989 733, cognitive social, western world, reducing recidivism, zanden 1993, vander zanden 1993, cognitive social learning,
Approximate Word count = 1624
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Controlling Criminal Behavior