Keeping Families Together
Family Preservation Practice refer
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Family Preservation Practice refers to the provision of social work services toward the goal of keeping families together and is most often used in cases involving concern over the welfare of children (Peterson, Kohrt, Shadoin & Authier, 1996). Several different values constitute the conceptual foundation of family preservation practice (Berry, 1992). One of these values is empowerment. The purpose of the review of literature presented here is to examine several publications in which the value of empowerment of families is particularly salient. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of the relatedness of the value of empowerment to other values underlying family preservation practice. Family Preservation Practice and Empowerment Research on Empowerment in Family Preservation Practice MacEachron, Gustavsson, Cross and Lewis (1996) discussed family preservation practice and empowerment as it relates to the effectiveness of the Indian Welfare Act of 1978. The term "empowerment" was conceptually defined by the authors as the ability of the tribe to self-determine their own welfare policies and practices. It was noted that the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) extended tribal self-determination policy to include child welfare and family preservation issues, the Act being a response to the large numbers of Indian children removed from their families and placed in non-Indian settings. Of interest to MacEachron, Gustavsson, Cross and Lewis (1996)
. . .
mpetent social workers. She notes that Asian families receiving family preservation services are greatly in need of culturally competent caseworkers. Fong is particularly concerned with providing guidelines for culturally competent family preservation practice as well as fostering among workers an understanding of how empowerment and shared partnership may take place in ways appropriate to an Asian cultural perspective.
Toward the foregoing objectives, Fong (1994) outlines Asian family values and analyzes areas of potential ill fit with family preservation values. Three kinds of information are described that practitioners ought to know to serve Asian American clients effectively. It is stated that simply knowing this small amount of information will strongly improve the power (effectiveness) of caseworkers.
Families receiving family preservation services are required to make a number of changes. Cole, Hammond and Tucker (1989) report that families may be considered to be empowered by services to the extent that they are able to successfully make the changes required of them. However, according to the authors, the caseloads of many social workers are so large that they cannot visit families to check on whether they are ma
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Cheung Stevenson, Values Based, Hammond Tucker, Virginia Data, Cross Lewis, Preservation Project, Shadoin Authier, family preservation, Native Americans, Welfare Act, Act ICWA, family preservation practice, preservation practice, family preservation services, preservation services, cultural competence, value empowerment, child welfare, cross lewis 1996, foster care, social workers, cultural diversity, cross lewis, leung cheung stevenson, cheung stevenson 1994,
Approximate Word count = 1519
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
|