ificant satire should cause even the reader who disagrees with the satirist to at least momentarily consider the opposing view, because of either the original insight or the brilliant humor or the conviction and passion of the writer.
Ehrenreich's essays are, to the contrary, tame and cute, always going for the tickle when she should be going for the jugular. Her style, to this reader, is annoying and verges on the sophomoric. it is not that she cannot write well, for she can. That is one of h
...