Governmental Response to Youth Employment Needs:

A Comparison of California, Boston, Ma., and New York City/State

Employment opportunities for youth in the United States in general and in certain geographic locales in particular have been in decline in recent decades (Crosby 4). According to recent studies by Northwestern UniversityÆs Center for Labor Market Studies, the 2004 unemployment rate in the United States for teenagers û 40.2 percent nationally û was the lowest since the federal government began collecting data on this issue in 1948 (Crosby 4). Teenagers were identified by this research as the most adversely affected group with respect to the recession experienced in the U.S. in 2001 and as the group least likely to have benefited substantially from the national jobs recovery that has taken place since the fall of 2003.

Other data reported by Crosby (4) highlighted this situation further:

. The unemployment rate for U.S. teens in June 2004

. Black teens were only half as likely as white teens to

hold a summer job (22.5 percent versus 44.5 percent).

. June unemployment among white teens in 2004 also fell to

Crosby (5) noted that the problem, though experienced in virtually all geographic locales and regions, was particularly acute in larger metropolitan community areas where competition for work roles traditionally occupied by adolescents o

. . .
hough under certain cases, they may be 14 and 15. In the year-round program, they must be economically disadvantaged (10 percent may not be if they have serious barriers to employment). Sixty-five percent must be "hard-to-serve" in specific categories. At least half must be out-of-school youth. In summer programs, they must be economically disadvantaged. All adults are eligible for core services ages 18 older. Priority for intensive services must be given to recipients of public assistance and other low-income individuals in areas where funds are limited. Dislocated workersûexcludes long-term unemployed from definition of dislocated worker and adds displaced homemakers. Youth must be ages 14-21, low income, and meet at least one of six specific barriers to employment. Five percent may be non-low- income if they have one or more specified barriers to school completion or employment. At least 30 percent of the funds must be spent on out-of-school youth. "One-Stop" Service Delivery "One-Stop" implementation grants are currently awarded with Wagner-Peyser funds, but there are no statutory requirements to provide services through the "One-Stop" system. Establishes the "One-Stop" delivery system as the access point
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Department Labor, Employment Ratesö, Jobs Project, York City, Dislocated Workers, Secretary Labor, Youths Facilityö, Services Requires, Jobs Future, Market Studies, youth employment, workforce investment, jobs project, department labor, job training, york city, economically disadvantaged, san francisco, skills training, dislocated workers, local elected officials, workforce investment boards, boston jobs project, employment development department, adults dislocated workers,
Approximate Word count = 9582
Approximate Pages = 38 (250 words per page)

More Essays on Governmental Response to Youth Employment Needs: