Euthanasia: Pros and Cons
This is an excerpt from the paper...
There are strong proponents on both sides of the debate for and against euthanasia. The word ôeuthanasiaö comes from two Greek words, ôeuö meaning good, and ôthanatosö meaning death. Proponents of euthanasia believe it is everyoneÆs right to die at a time of their own choosing, and in a manner of their own choosing, when faced with terminal illness rather than suffer through to the bitter end. Opponents argue that euthanasia cannot be a ôprivate matter of self-determination and personal beliefs, because it is an act that requires two people to make it possible and a complicit society to make it acceptableö (Somerville 33). They consider euthanasia the equivalent of murder, which is against the law everywhere in civilized society, and maintain that medicine and law are the ôprincipal institutions that maintain respect for human life in a secular pluralistic society.ö Somerville accuses euthanasia proponents of wanting to make death a purely technical issue, of stripping it of all its humanity, and allowing us to control the time, place, and manner of our death to make it as cheap and efficient as possible. It is interesting that she makes a distinction between euthanasia as an active process designed to end life, yet does not consider withdrawing life-saving treatment in the same light. Others do not make this distinction (Last). It is also of interest that she dismisses the notion that physicians are presently carrying out euthanasia in some cases quietly, and in a di
. . .
and insist that doctors ôkillö over 1,000 patients there each year who have not asked for euthanasia. However, Smith claims in the same article that ônot much is known about the actual practice of assisted suicide since it is practiced in darkest secrecyö when referring to physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, even though much has indeed been published about it (31-32).
Physician-assisted suicide has been legal in Oregon since 1997 (Rollin 127-131). The physician is not permitted to administer the legal dose, but can write a prescription for sufficient medication for the patient to end their life. The physician can be present while the patient ends their life, but may not physically assist in the death, otherwise it becomes euthanasia, which is still illegal in every state in the U.S. Contrary to what euthanasia and assisted suicide opponents would have us believe, since passage of the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon four years ago, only 140 people have asked for prescriptions for lethal medication, and to date, only 91 of them have used these medications to hasten their death. Predictions that the law would be used to coerce elderly poor patients to die have proved false. All but one of the assisted-suicide patients to
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Netherlands Belgium, Hemlock Society, Act Oregon, Federation Oregon, Belgium Courts, Dignity Center, Smith Wesley, Watson Rory, Somerville Margaret, physician-assisted suicide, assisted suicide, terminally ill, smith 31, suicide physician-assisted suicide, suicide physician-assisted, patient life, smith cites, euthanasia proponents, pro conö free, terminal illness, conö free inquiry, death dignity, physician-assisted suicide pro, suicide pro conö,
Approximate Word count = 1500
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
