Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company

90). A good place to review this material would be at www.epic.org/misc/gulc/. However, the codification of principles of privacy law waited until Prosser, Privacy, 48 Cal.L.Rev. 383 (1960), which Prosser subsequently entered into the Second Restatement of Torts at 652A-652I (1977) (The law of information..., 1998). Reviewing Supreme court cases can be done most efficiently from www1.law.emory.edu/ (Information, 1997).

Part of the reason for the delay in recognizing privacy as a

fundamental right is that most modern invasions of privacy involve new technology (e.g., telephone wiretaps, microphones and electronic amplifiers for eavesdropping, photographic and video cameras, computers for collecting/storing/finding information).

Because privacy is an emerging right, a discussion of privacy is typically a list

...

< Prev Page 2 of 6 Next >

More on Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 18:47, May 06, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1709231.html