| |
| |
Nasa: Decision-making and Goal-setting |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

WORKSHOP FIVE: TOTAL QUALITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR IMPROVING NASA'S HIGH-LEVEL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS - THE APPROACH TO PROGRAM GOAL SETTING-PRIORITIZING PROGRAM GOALS-FUNDING-OPERATIONAL DECISION-MAKING) A proposal to improve the high-level decision-making process (program goal setting-prioritizing program goals-funding-operational decision-making) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been developed and put forward for consideration by top-level NASA management. The objective of this current effort is to persuade top management at NASA to implement the proposed plan for improving the agency's high-level decision-making process. The persuasion strategy is a strategy based on "educating" NASA top management of the value of the proposed plan for improvement. "Educating" within the context of this strategy refers to providing NASA top management with the relevant information (and explanations of that information when requested) that will allow top management at the agency to evaluate the worthiness of the proposed change to the high-level decision-making process at NASA. The information relevant to educating top management at NASA concerning the proposed changes to the high-level decision-making process includes four elements. These elements are (a) the "As Is" state of the high-level decision-making process, (b) the To Be" state of the high-level decision-making process, (c) the benefits associated with moving from the "As Is" sta
Related Essays
NASA AND A DATA COLLECTION PLAN A NASA IMPROVED PROCESS AND DATA COLLECTION PLAN: HIGH-LEVEL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS (PROGRAM GOAL SETTING-PRIORITIZING PROGRAM GOALS-FUNDING-OPERATIONAL .... (1261 5 )
NASA NEEDS ASSESSMENT .... at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is the high-level decision-making process that involves program goal setting-prioritizing program .... (1450 6 )
The Challenger Disaster .... came to shove, it appears that MTI backed off, and allowed NASA and the .... In the end, the decision making process ran afoul of the wrong goal being pursued .... (1824 7 )
General Partnerships .... NASA is employing artificial noses in space .... be a significant asset to business and managerial decision-making. 10. .... The statement, "Management's goal is not to .... (3473 14 )

management includes Administrator S. O'Keefe (2004) and Deputy Administrator F. D. Gregory (2005). The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is J. Bollen. The Senate Majority Leader is Bill Frist. The Speaker of the House of Representatives is D. Hastert.
Key Requirements for Key Customer Satisfaction
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is more than just another agency of the federal government in the United States. NASA conducts important research that either or both expands humanity's store of knowledge or creates practical applications that provide direct benefits to humanity. NASA, however, also has another important role - a social and a psychological role for the American public, as well as for people outside of the United States (O'Keefe, 2004). To effectively fill these diverse roles, NASA must be a stable organization. NASA's long-term program goals must be stable, and the funding plan for approved programs must be in place on a long-term basis (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2005). Stability in program goals and stability in long-term funding for NASA imply comparable stability and responsibility on the part of the national political leadership in the United States
Category: Business - N
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Space Administration, Administration NASA, Management Budget, Foundation NASA, United NASA, Persuading NASA's, Recognizing Success, United Gregory, United O'Keefe, Key Customer, decision-making process, high-level decision-making, high-level decision-making process, aeronautics space administration, national aeronautics, space administration, aeronautics space, national aeronautics space, top management, proposed change, process nasa, decision-making process nasa, key customer, change high-level decision-making, washington dc,
= 1359
= 5 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
| |
|
|