Erwin Chemerinsky's Critique of Supreme Court Decision in 2000 Election

This litigation began almost as soon as the election ended. Democratic candidate Al Gore received more votes nationwide than Republican candidate George W. Bush and held a lead in the Electoral College, pending the results from Florida. But Bush held a slim lead there, pending a final count, and Florida's electoral votes would give him the Presidency.

The closeness of the vote prompted several counties to undertake recounts. Those recounts, however, would not be completed within the deadline set by Florida's Secretary of State, so she declared her intention to not count votes received late. Her decision, however, was overruled by the Florida Supreme Court, which ordered the state to include the recounted ballots (even the late ones) in it

. . .
ue, however, that the Court could evaluate the standards that each Florida county would adhere to and judge whether they passed Constitutional muster. In addition, such a move would be more efficient and less costly. If the Court had let the recount proceed, the various counties would know their actions would not be overturned. If the Court ended the recount beforehand, the counties would save the expense and time of undergoing such an ordeal. Chemerinsky also argues that Bush did not have standing to challenge the recount. According to the professor, a litigant may only allege a violation of equal protection if he is injured. This principle, which is also derived from Article III of the Constitution, insures that federal courts only hear suits from litigants with a stake in the outcome, so they are not swamped by frivolous lawsuits. Here, Bush did not allege his rights had been violated, but the rights of voters because ballots would be counted differently in each county. One exception to this rule is third-party standing, where a third party may litigate the claims of another who is unable to do so. Third-party standing is only permitted when there is a close relationship between the litigant and the injured party, or
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Bush Gore, Supreme Court, Chemerinsky Court's, Considering Republican, Fourteenth Amendment, III Constitution, Scalia Bush, Court's December, Chemerinsky's Bush's, County Court, equal protection, supreme court, december 12, equal protection claim, protection claim, recount court, december 9, court recount, ballots counted, 2000 election, majority decision, florida supreme court, completed december 12, los angeles times, voters ballots counted,
Approximate Word count = 1919
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)