LotsOfEssays.com

d" has never been the law. Some restrictions have been imposed since the Roe v. Wade decision was first made.

What we are arguing about, then, is not whether the state can compel a pregnant woman to carry her child to term but when the government may do so. The division of a pregnancy into trimesters is arbitrary and has no real ethical or medical support. It was rather a way to bring together disparate interests on the Court than a rational analysis of the issue. Life begins at conception, and there is no reason to feel that the child becomes more human at some point, whereas it was not at all human before that point.

Indeed, for those who insist that there is no scientific evidence that an embryo can be considered human or that it can have a "soul" and therefore warrant protection, we argue that there is also no evidence to t

...