The Iliad and the Aeneid
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The Iliad and the Aeneid are undoubtedly two of the greatest epics ever written. They form part of the foundation from which the entire western classical tradition was erected and are considered to be among the worldÆs canonic masterpieces. Both epics are focused on the exploits of a man who is half-god and half-mortal: in the Iliad, the Greek hero Achilles is the focal point of the narrative; in the Aeneid the Roman hero Aeneas is the principal actor. Where the two epics differ markedly is in their treatment of the heroÆs honor. While Achilles is consumed with his personal honor, Aeneas conception of honor is bound in his duty to his people. Thus, the Iliad and the Aeneid, while at first glance being relatively similar, really portray two radically different conceptions of honor. HomerÆs portrays the Greek concept honor as being markedly individualistic, focused on heroic exploits for the sake of being remembered throughout the ages. Virgil portrays the roman concept of honor as being bound in the duty to the state and the people, where heroic exploits are done for the sake of oneÆs countrymen and the good of the republic. This paper will compare and contrast these ideals of honor. First we will explore HomerÆs concept of honor. Then we will examine VirgilÆs treatment of honor in the Aeneid. Lastly, we will compare the two conceptions and clearly show their very different foci. The Iliad is considered by many to be the greatest epic poem ever written. Over 15,
. . .
Iliad thus advances the Greek concept of honor as intricately tied to personal glory. According to David Cohen in his book Law, Sexuality and Society: The Enforcement of Morals in Classical Athens, people in ôface to faceö societies felt shame on account of their behavior as opposed to guilt. He writes, ôThe moral perspective of shame involves evaluating oneself in significant measure according to the way in which one is seen by others. Guilt, however, arises more from internal recognition, before oneself, of wrongdoing, and is expressed through remorse, repentance, and a desire to restore a damaged relationshipö (Cohen 58). Shame, then, involves losing face in the eyes of others; honor involves gaining face in the eyes of others. The reward for struggle and competition was honor, which the Greeks called time. In many ways, time was almost tangible. It could be gained and lost, and there was an honor hierarchy that the Greeks abided by. A person could only gain honor at the expense of someone with equal or greater honor; displaying too much power over people with less or no honor was frowned upon. For instance, if a group of elites decided to attack a poor man, they would lose face (Pomperoy, 10-30). Thus, in the Iliad the onl
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Iliad Achilles, Iliad Aeneid, Classical Athens, Aeneasö Aeneas, Greeks Romans, Priam HectorÆs, Greeks Agamemnon, Rome Book, XII HectorÆs, Ultimately Achilles, concept honor, iliad aeneid, beginning aeneid, university press, york ny, achilles honor, trojan king, iliad achilles, greek hero, law sexuality society, greek concept, heroic exploits sake, bound duty people, honor bound duty, york ny 1990,
Approximate Word count = 2314
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Iliad and the Aeneid
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
