Hamlet
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The drama Hamlet revolves around HamletÆs attempts to outwit his uncle, King Claudius. Claudius has murdered HamletÆs father. Throughout the play, Hamlet manages to outsmart his uncle. He foils ClaudiusÆ plans to have him murdered by enlisting the aid of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Hamlet also has an opportunity to kill Claudius as he sits in a confessional, but Hamlet decides he should wait for an opportunity when Claudius will not be absolved of his sins. Hamlet also uses a play within the play, The Mousetrap, in which to ôcatch the conscienceö of the King (Shakespeare II.ii 1087). Despite these and other actions wherein Hamlet remains more aware than Claudius, in the final act Hamlet succumbs to ClaudiusÆ treachery. He is killed in a duel with Laertes, whose sword has been dipped in poison, a duel orchestrated by Claudius. By setting up the duel that both Laertes and Hamlet are fooled into carrying out, Claudius makes them both victims of dramatic irony. There are a number of reasons that HamletÆs ability to outwit Claudius are undermined by Act V. One of the biggest of these is his recognition that he has killed Polonius unfairly and by mistake. Therefore, when Claudius eggs on Laertes to duel with Hamlet, Hamlet does not turn down the invitation or avoid the conflict. Of course, Laertes is unaware that Claudius has rigged the fight in order for Hamlet to be murdered. HamletÆs indecision and indifference throughout the play also po
. . .
an ethos. Later in the play he maintains in a discussion with Horatio that, ôThereÆs a divinity that shapes our ends, / Rough-hew them how we willö (Shakespeare V.ii 1108).
It is such an ethos that seems to make Hamlet willing to engage in the duel with Laertes that is orchestrated by Claudius. Hamlet appears to believe that no matter what attempts human beings make to shape their destinies, there is an outside force that will rule the day despite such efforts. We see ample evidence of such thinking in Hamlet during the course of the play. In an later comment to Horatio, Hamlet once more appears to think he is helpless in the face of destiny or some external force that is shaping his end. As he says, ôNot a white, we defy augury: thereÆs a special providence in the fall of a sparrowö (Shakespeare V.ii. 1110). Such a philosophy or ethos is almost Zen-like in its attitude that all things are connected and even the death of a sparrow has ramifications to the universe.
Such indifference as is exhibited by Hamlet throughout the play is also a sign perhaps of depression or suicidal thinking. After all, Hamlet has lost his father to murder by his uncle, and he is quite beside himself that his mother has barely taken off her mourn
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Shakespeare Vii, Hamlet Hamlet, Despite HamletÆs, Shakespeare Iv, Harold Bloom, Shakespeare IIii, Laertes Hamlet, Conclusion Hamlet, Claudius Hamlet, Act Hamlet, throughout play, shakespeare vii, play hamlet, shakespeare iiii, duel laertes, bloom 1998, hamletÆs indifference, shakespeare vii 1110, play play, indifference acceptance, hamletÆs ethos, ability outwit claudius, hamletÆs indifference acceptance, hamlet course play,
Approximate Word count = 1273
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Hamlet
|