Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

The Killer Angels

This is an excerpt from the paper...

In The Killer Angels, author Michael Shaara (1996) recreates a fictional-historical account of the Battle of Gettysburg, a four-day period in June and July of 1863. The book opens with the first battle and extends through PickettÆs Charge. Shaara (1996) argues that the reason for writing the novel that unfolds to us primarily through the personal perspectives of three of its participants was so that readers can know ôwhat it was like to be [at the Battle], what the weather was like, what menÆs faces looked likeö (vii).

The novel provides us with the Battle of Gettysburg from multiple perspectives, those of Colonel Joshua L. Chamberlain (Union) and Generals Robert E. Lee and James Longstreet, both for the Confederacy. Through actual correspondence and a number of historical documents, Shaara reveals the realities of combat at Gettysburg. Along the way the novel provides the reader with the feelings and thoughts of Chamberlain, Lee and Longstreet. This aspect of the novel is fiction, but through these different perspectives we come to a greater appreciation of the Battle and its participants. By providing multiple perspectives on the Civil War, Shaara does an excellent job of illustrating the human factor involved in AmericaÆs war of brother against brother.

The authorÆs effort to show us the human factor behind the conflicts of the Civil War is greatly aided by his use of multiple perspectives. The book alternates our look at the w

. . .
ayed as a General who fights the war because he likes to achieve victory in combat not as someone with deep moral convictions about it. We see this by being privy to more fabricated thoughts attributed to him by Shaara (1996), ô[Longstreet] did not think much of the Cause. He was a professional: the Cause was Victoryö (68). While one of the primary causes of the Civil War was the secession of the Southern States from the Union, ShaaraÆs (1996) account portrays the conflict as being one fought over freedom and equality versus slavery and aristocratic (i.e. Southern) class distinctions. While Shaara tries not to glorify the cause of either the North or South, his fictional accounts of the thoughts of significant participants on both sides does appear to bias the perception. For example, after PickettÆs Charge is recognized as a failure by the Southern forces, General Lee is portrayed as someone, like Longstreet, with no particular personal agenda for conducting the war. As he ôtellsö Longstreet, ôYou and I we have no Cause. We have only the Armyö (Shaara 1996, 3612). Likewise, in a letter to his brother, Tom Chamberlain mocks a Confederate prisonerÆs confusion over why he is fighting in the Civil War, ôThen after that I ask
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Battle Gettysburg, Battle Shaara, North South, Lee Longstreet, Killer Angels, Civil War, Charge Shaara, Union ShaaraÆs, PickettÆs Charge, Despite ShaaraÆs, shaara 1996, multiple perspectives, battle gettysburg, killer angels, north south, civil war, novel provides, moral ideology, human factor, shaaraÆs 1996, gettysburg novel provides, providing multiple perspectives, 1996 killer angels,
Approximate Word count = 1235
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$