U.S., Canadian & Australian Exploitation of Natives

II. The United States has made recent gains in protecting native rights.

Executive Order 13007 and the land claims of Quechan Indians.

B. Hawaiian sovereignty movement and State office of land claims.

III. Australia has made significant gains in honoring aboriginal rights.

IV. Canada has made significant gains in honoring aboriginal rights.

Rights of self-governance granted to natives.

V. New Zealand has pursued an equal partnership with its native people, moving farther along the path towards pure equality than Canada, the U.S. or Australia.

Most Americans are familiar with the sorry history of the ways in which the United States government and settlers of European ancestry have over the centuries continually violated the legal and moral rights of the native peoples of the country. But the history of the United States is not unique in this respect û although this is hardly a fact in which Americans can take comfort. If one looks at the United States, Australia, and Canada, one discovers that each of these countries has in fundamental ways violated the rights of native peoples, with the most of the worst violations occurring in the earliest years of settlement, when indigenous groups were still in possession of large amounts of territory. During the 20th

. . .
one of the ore heaps away from an area called the Trail of Dreams and to endow money and a truck for three years so a tribe member could engage in cultural education projects full time are sufficient compensation. The outcome of this case may signal a reversal in traditional U.S. policy, which has been to favor the rights of racial groups other than Native Americans and to consider the exploitation of the land for natural resources to be of primary importance (Perry, 1998, p. A3). In other areas of the United States, official policy has not changed much in favor of native peoples, but in some cases the native peoples themselves are trying to force change, as in Hawaii (Sahagun and Essoyan, 1994, p. A4). In the 1990s, Hawaiians statewide have risen up against the department that was created to enable Hawaiians to return to lands taken from them at the turn of the century, become self-sufficient and preserve their values, traditions and culture. People of at least 50 percent native ancestry are entitled to lease homestead lots for $1 a year for 99 years on close to 200,000 acres of land scattered across the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, Oahu and Kauai. But so far, only 6,000 native Hawaiians have been homesteaded since 1921 (S
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Australia Canada, Land Act, Sahagun Essoyan, Home Lands, Lands Act, Waitangi Tribunal, Native Americans, A4 Strapped, Land Management, Canada Australia, native peoples, armitage 1995, aboriginal land, australia canada, land claims, perry 1998, sahagun essoyan, home lands, sahagun essoyan 1994, essoyan 1994, hawaiian home lands, native americans, los angeles times, essoyan 1994 a4, gains honoring aboriginal,
Approximate Word count = 1683
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)