Views of Gandhi & Mao on Violence & Imperialism
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine the views of Mohandas K. Gandhi and Mao Tse-tung on the subject of whether violence should be used to defeat imperialism, achieve independence, and gain social justice. The plan of the research will be to set forth the historical and political context in which the views of Mao and Gandhi emerged, and then to discuss how their arguments differ, as well as the arguments for and against the use of violence, with a view toward suggesting the position that appears to lend itself most strongly to political and historical cogency.The public lives of Mao Tse-tung and Mohandas K. Gandhi were roughly contemporary as far as achievement of their respective goals of political revolution are concerned. The elder contemporary, Gandhi, was assassinated at the age of 80 in 1948, following the achievement of India's absolute independence from British rule and about one year before Mao's communist revolution succeeded on the Chinese mainland. The public lives of Gandhi and Mao were circumscribed by an apparently absolute commitment to radical social transformation in the modern period. In China and India, respectively, Mao and Gandhi were positioned in the vanguard of political, social, and economic change. Indeed, Merriam says that both leaders' charisma took on the character of near deification among their most loyal followers. The popular historical record readily confirms their success in achieving measurable transformation of their societies and
. . .
demonstrators who approached the gates were clubbed.
In contrast to Gandhi's view of the structure of political revolution, Mao's conception of violence in political action in general and revolution in particular appears to have been instrumental. As Gross explains, "Mao advanced further strategy and tactics of direct action by combining political and military strategy and war and revolutionary means. . . . [His] long-range strategy, outlined in his essay On Contradictions, is based on . . . a general proposition that change is determined by contradictions and conflicts." Of particular interest in this regard is Mao's utilization of the Chinese peasantry and the People's Liberation Army in accomplishing the Communist revolutionary victory in China and in structuring post-revolutionary society.
The long-term connection of Mao with the peasantry has been noted by a number of commentators. Initially an urban revolutionary, Mao "grasped the peasants' revolutionary possibilities" in the mid-1920s. Solomon quotes Mao's view of the central role of the peasantry in revolutionary theory:
Formerly I had not fully realized the degree of class struggle among the peasantry, but after the May 30 [1925] Incident, and during the great wave of
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Orderly British, Cultural Revolution, Jew Germany, Liberty March, Rule Self-Rule, Liberation Army, India India, Army Bullard, Gandhi Mao, War Liberation, passive resistance, gandhi mao, mao gandhi, cultural revolution, social justice, people's liberation army, liberation army, political military, indian independence, public lives, political revolution, berkeley university california, gandhi ed louis, university california press, world war ii,
Approximate Word count = 2762
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
|