The Politics of U.S. Oil Energy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Before the modification, the assigned topic was ôThe Politics of Energy Policy Following September 11: Stratificationism, Pluralism or Hyperpluralism?ö That secondary question is essential to the revised discussion, since it goes to the heart of what is usually referred to as the nationÆs ôenergy policy.ö Putting that phrase in quotation marks indicates that, to this writer at least, this phrase is extremely suspect, since it suggests that the actions of the United States of America, or the United States of Bush, reflect some sort of logical and coherent belief structure. It will be the object of this paper to prove that the actions of the Bush administration are an example of stratificationism to a degree hitherto unknown in the United States. We shall do this by creating the following sections. Section One will be a definition of terms. Section Two will discuss ôenergy policyö before September 11, 2001. Section Three will attempt to sift through the public statements concerning America and the challenges it faces following the September 11 incident. Section Four will feature a conclusion. There are four terms that must be defined for this paper to be meaningful. The first three are terms of art in discussing political systems. They are ôPluralismö, ôHyperpluralismö, and ôStratificationismö. The fourth term is ôEnergy Policy.ö Pluralism, according to Morris, is based
. . .
xico for the trade and joint production of oil, oil products, natural gas, coal and electricity. (5)
We can assume that the article is reporting a reasonable facsimile of the truth, and this suggests that the oil song was going to be one that Bush would sing many times before September 11.
Section Three: After September 11
In a long and well-reasoned article, Keith Schneider, writing about the September 11 event, and its impact on the American energy policy -- and in particular its impact on oil -- observes
With so many Americans dead on their own soil, the terrorist attack in effect opened a new chapter in a decades-old skirmish about the real meaning of national security and the consequences of a way of life based on the profligate use of oil and other natural resources (6).
Rather than being yet another litany of the evils of oil, Schneider deals with a wide variety of pro-environment and pro-oil forces, with the resulting conclusion that what is needed is a return to a firm Presidential leadership. As he states, ôThe Sept. 11 attacks have raised the stakes in the battle for effective government. In no arena are the choices more starkly apparent, or the chance for a progressive victory more readily attainable, than in the
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Keith Schneider, Unity Rauch, Policyö Pluralism, United Bush, Vice President, Policy September, Arctic Refuge, Kenneth Lay, Colombia Liberal, Section Conclusion, september 11, energy policy, power elite, ôenergy policyö, national security, policy september, policy september 11, energy policy september, vice president, bush oil study, taliban osama, osama bin, bin laden, oil study evolution, george bush oil,
Approximate Word count = 1840
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Politics of U.S. Oil Energy
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
