Censorship Concepts and Issues
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The concept of censorship is relatively simple: material that is harmful to people in some way should not be allowed to circulate where they can see, hear, or be influenced by it. Material that incites people to commit acts of violence or terrorism should likewise be censored. Information that compromises the national security must be censored. Censorship in its purest form is protection. As protection, censorship is a good thing that a civilized society needs for combating harmful influences as much as it needs firemen to fight fires and law enforcement officers to battle criminals. It is an invisible bubble that prevents undesirable influences from corrupting, terrorizing, or brainwashing innocent people. Yet there are people who are vehemently opposed to censorship.One might ask how there can be such vast differences of opinion over whether something that is gravely harmful should be censored or not. The controversy in censorship arises because not everyone agrees on what is harmful, what incites violence and terrorism, or what compromises the national security. While many mothers wish to protect their children from pornography, for example, there are many more people who feel their civil rights are being stifled if they cannot view, listen to, and purchase pornography. They do not view pornography as damagingùin spite of a multitude of scientific evidence to the contraryùand they regard the censorship of pornography as wrong. The unresolved issues in censorshi
. . .
o proliferate but desensitizes people to them. Desensitization, in turn, causes further proliferation. The ubiquity of pornography, for example, has had a numbing effect on the sensitivities that would normally alert people with a sensation of embarrassment when they are stepping over the line; in todayÆs world of porn on every corner, this embarrassment has all but vanished.
One of my friends saw a man sitting in a parked car on a busy street in the crowded downtown area of a metropolitan city, ôpleasing himselföùas my friend puts itùin full view of passersby. The manÆs only concession to privacy was a handkerchief laid over his private parts, which provoked my friend to quip, ôAs if THAT made any difference!ö The handkerchief was a telling symbol, signifying that the man considered himself unseen and cloaked with privacy under it, yet his actions were clear to everyone else. This is one of the primary deceptions of pornographyùôNobody knows.ö Another is ôIÆm doing nothing wrong.ö And the most common is, ôIt doesnÆt hurt anyone.ö People who have been seduced and thus deluded by pornography are in no position to make an objective judgment about the harm it causes, so the rest of us have to do it, and law enforcement has
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Sink Shipsö, Entertainmentö Censorship, Media Entertainmentö, Jones Censorship, War II, Patrick HenryÆs, Textbooks Wallbuilders, Affairs CMPA, God Bible, media entertainmentö, ôviolence media, ôviolence media entertainmentö, military censorship, web site, censorship pornography, censorship pornography violence, ideological censorship, pornography violence, lips sink, sink shipsö, national security, lips sink shipsö, ôloose lips sink, media awareness network,
Approximate Word count = 2259
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Censorship Concepts and Issues
|