Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Copfer v. Golden

here are several elements to the doctrine of "attractive nuisance," such that the contrivance must be "artificial and uncommon, as well as dangerous." Courts in California have repeatedly held that a body of water, natural or artificial, is not such a thing as may be held to constitute an "attractive nuisance." It may be attractive to children, but it is also of a common and ordinary nature of that which is to be found anywhere.

8. Separate Opinions, Including Dissents Neither the separate, concurring opinion by White, P.J, nor the dissenting opinion by Doran, J. appears.

9. Other Items of Note While the court held that a swimming pool is not an "attractiv

...

< Prev Page 3 of 10 Next >

More on Copfer v. Golden...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Copfer v. Golden. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 22:03, May 16, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1713256.html