Perception & Illusion in the Prints of M.C Escher

Arnold Berleant (p. 194), in commenting on the work of M.C. Escher, stated that ôarts that tend to reach toward what lies outside are exemplified by...optical art (including the visually magnetic art of Escher).ö Such art forms and works, says Berleant (p. 195), offer ôentrance to new regions of sensibility and awarenessö and introduce questions regarding the ôkinds of sensory and conscious experience that are germane to the arts and how and what they signify.ö In the case of the substantial body of work created by Maurits Cornelius Escher, inspiration drawn from mathematical ideas including structures such as the plane and projective geometry are important in focusing the viewerÆs perceptions and creating illusions (Goode, p. 39). This brief essay will examine the effects and sources of perception and illusion in the work of Escher, arguing that a solid mathematical analysis of space and place underpin his creations.

Escher was born in 1898 in Leeuwarden in the Netherlands, and his first works date from the 1920s and early 1930s when he was living in Rome. He did not, however, achieve fame or public popularity until the 1950s. Goode (p. 39) states that ôthe art world has hardly taken notice, except to condescend. But the public passionately loves (his work).ö Escher claimed to work with no mathematics or geometry in mind. According to Goode (p. 40), Escher was well aware that his work was rooted in geometry and ma

. . .
ds and fish that are separate, distinct, and yet equivalent. The viewer chooses to see either the birds or the fish but cannot necessarily see both simultaneously. Escher followed in many works the crystallographic rules of transformation in which one element ôbecomesö another (Teuber, p. 141). Repeated shifting, turning about axes, and glide mirror image are the key characteristics of this transformation rule set. Ivars Peterson (p. 408) believes that the concept of infinity is central to the work of Escher who long sought to capture this elusive notion in visual images. One of his primary strategies for capturing infinity was the creation of repeating patterns of interlocking figures. In another approach, Escher tried to fit together replicas of a figure that diminish in size as they spiral into or recede from a point in the middle of a square or circular frame. Essentially, says Peterson (p. 409), Escher owed much of his technique to mathematics, which offered him a precise yet aesthetically pleasing way ôto depict diminishing figures within a circle.ö Mathematicians argue that the work of Escher stems from the same basic principles of curved geometry. The Poincar disk, introduced over a century ago by the Fren
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Gallery Art, Rubin Gestaltists, MC Escher, Henri Poincar, Ivars Peterson, Cornelius Escher, Marianne Teuber, According Goode, Essentially Peterson, Leeuwarden Netherlands, national gallery, national gallery art, gallery art, gallery art 1, art 1, mc escher, peterson 408, viewerÆs perceptions, goode 39, animal figures, impossible spaces, perception illusion,
Approximate Word count = 1388
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)