No-Smoking Policy Review

Smoking has long been known to be harmful to the health. Efforts to persuade consumers to stop smoking at the macro level via television ads and other means have not been exceptionally effective, primarily because nicotine addiction overrides the individual's desire to stop smoking. Within communities, greater success has been achieved through the outlawing of smoking in public buildings and through community-wide smoking cessation programs. At the micro level, many companies have now adopted a strict no-smoking policy that either forces smokers to leave the building during breaks in order to smoke or prohibits smoking completely during work hours. Some companies have even prohibited employees from smoking during their off hours at home. These micro-level no-smoking policies have been extremely effective at reducing employee smoking at the workplace and have also been identified as the reason for decreased smoking overall. Strict no-smoking policies have not been popular with smokers, and in many cases merely instituting rules against smoking without mounting a persuasive campaign or making any other changes engenders conflict rather than achieving the desired results. Workplace transformations such as changing a workplace from a smoking to a non-smoking workplace are a form of organizational development, and as such, they require more to be successful than a new set of rules. This paper will examine the issue of no-smoking policies in the workplace, their imp

Related Essays

Second-Hand Smoke .... and hospitals) will not be included because the review of literature .... with the dependent variables being the type of policy (ie, no smoking versus designated .... (6011 24 )

Cigarette Smoking in American Society .... to corporate smoking policies: The questions no longer concern .... they ask how restrictive the policy should be .... on proposal to curb teen smoking" (October 1995). .... (2017 8 )

Cigarette Smoking .... There are no "right" or "wrong" answers; we are only interested .... each of the listed factors regarding cigarette smoking should be enacted into policy and law .... (2611 10 )

NEGATIVE HEALTH EFFECTS OF SMOKING Introduction .... For example, somebody who has smoked no more than five .... The Institute of Medicine report on smoking: A blueprint for a renewed public health policy. .... (816 3 )

Smoking and Its Risks .... Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) released a review of 12 .... when children are in the car, or when office policy forbids it. .... No smoking please. .... (2239 9 )

s. Some of the reasons that organizations are now stepping up to the plate to initiate no-smoking policies include concerns about lost work time due to smoke breaks, lawsuits on the part of nonsmokers who believe that coworkers' cigarette smoke caused them health problems, and the rising cost of employer health insurance. A change from a smoking to a nonsmoking environment entails three types of change: developmental, transitional, and transformational.[iv] Developmental change involves improvements to the status quo, such as developing a better workplace where innovation and change are welcome, and people adapt better to new approaches.[v] This type of change enables a company to develop a culture of change and transition that makes employees more receptive to change. Transitional change involves changing or replacing existing procedures with brand new ones.[vi] Transitional change occurs when a no-smoking policy is implemented and enforced. This type of change is more radical and more painful, and employees may feel the environment is unstable during this period and may feel insecure.[vii] Transformational change continues after the transitional period and can involve both developmental and transitional chang

Category: Misc - N