Peter Singer: Famine, Affluence, and Morality

What is the responsibility of the individual to saving people dying of famine? What is the responsibility of governments in regard to the same question? Does the Western moral code facilitate moral behavior? These are the questions that Peter Singer addressed in his seminal 1971 essay, "Famine, Affluence and Morality," and nearly 40 years after its publication, the essay continues to be provocative. This research considers the major points of Singer's argument followed by an analysis of the work.

Singer begins his essay with the simple proposition that suffering and death from lack of food is bad (Singer, 1972). He does not argue for this proposition but instead asserts that anyone who disagrees with it would not be swayed by any arguments to the contrary. He does present arguments for his second proposition, which is that if one can prevent suffering and death due to lack of food without sacrificing anything of comparable moral worth, one should. He then allows that on

Related Essays

Philosopher Peter Singer Philosopher Peter Singer sets forth in his article, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," the premise that the existence of famine and mass starvation in the .... (2409 10 )

Theoretical Ethical Dilemma .... In Philosophy & Public Affairs. 52-65. Singer, Peter. "Famine, Affluence, and Morality." In Philosophy & Public Affairs. 22-29. (1654 7 )

Category: Misc - P