Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Comparison of Two Studies

l ideology pursued by the book.

With respect to Findings, both studies presented their findings clearly and completely. The findings presented by Worthen and McNeill (2002) were derived directly from the analysis of the data collected. The findings presented by Burbules (2002), however, were his interpretations of the meaning of the specific ideological imperatives that he identified in the storyline of the book.

In each of the two studies, the findings were discussed extensively. The discussions also placed the study in context of the relevant wider bodies of knowledge.

In the Strategies for Promoting Validity and Reliability framework, Merriam (2002) identified eight appropriate strategies. Worthen and McNeill (2002) incorporated five of these strategies - peer review, researcher's position, adequate engagement in data collection, leaving an audit trail, and rich description. Because the Burbules (2002) study was a critical analysis of a single book, it necessarily used fewer of the strategies. The only two strategies used were clearly stating the researcher's position and providing rich description.

The phenomenological tradition was especially effective in the Worthen and McNeill (2002) study. The purpose of the study was to define the characteristics of effective supervision of counseling training from the perspectives and experiences of the supervisors. While the critical anal

...

< Prev Page 2 of 6 Next >

More on Comparison of Two Studies...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Comparison of Two Studies. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 04:02, March 29, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1704813.html