lity 2.94 2.36
Relevancy 2.03 2.82
Equity 2.19 3.18
Accountability 2.47 2.82
Note: Numbers indicate the extent to which the sample agreed or disagreed that the per formance evaluation process was charac terized by the factor indicated (Strongly agree = 5.0; strongly disagree = 1.0).
=============================================================== Evaluation Question One
Evaluation question one asked: Did the data indicate that the performance evaluation process for civilian employees at Hill Air Force Base had an adverse effect on the morale of such employees, thereby permitting an inference that the performance evaluation process had an adverse effect on the productivity of the civilian employees? The mean perceptions of the two sample groups with respect to this question are presented in Table 2, which may be found on the following page, while the results of the chi square analyses performed with respect to this question
are summarized in Table 3, which may be found on page 42 of the study.
Mean Perceptions, By Sample Group, of theExtent to Which the Performance
===============================================================
Characteristic Sample Group
Non supervisory Supervisory
Objectivity 2.13 2.30
Validity 2.00 2.39
Reliability 2.50 2.64
Relevancy ...