Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Law Case Analysis

tin, 749 F.2d 1514, 1517-18 (11th Cir. 1985) it was ruled that when a juror demonstrates that she can lay aside any opinion she might hold and render a judgment based solely on the evidence presented in court, then dismissal is not required. The Court obviously made this determination in the Mays case. Juror #6 did maintain that she can remain fair and impartial in her decision and the Court agreed, claiming Mays is “not entitled to a perfect jury, only…a fair one.” It would be difficult to come to such a conclusion in light of the juror’s stated bias against drug dealers. In the Duhaime’s Law Dictionary, voir dire is defined as, “A mini-hearing held during a trial on the admissibility of contested evidence. For example, a defendant may object to a plaintiff's witness. The court would suspend the trial, immediately preside over a hearing on the standing of the proposed witness, and then resume the trial with or without the witness, or with any restrictions placed on the testimony by

...

< Prev Page 2 of 7 Next >

More on Law Case Analysis...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Law Case Analysis. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 15:16, May 05, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/1685828.html