Republican Welfare Plan
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Recently, there has been a major discussion of the American welfare system and its costs, and inherent in this discussion has been a question as to whether we are morally obligated to help people who are unproductive and who may have made of themselves a burden on society. Taxpayers have become irate at the idea that some people are not doing their share but are expecting society at large to support them. Underlying this discussion is the question as to under what circumstances are we morally obligated to share the product of our labors with others? In seeking an answer, we must consider aspects of the concept of distributive justice and answer objections that might be raised. The Republican welfare plan now proposed in Congress raises a number of important issues. These are the ten real issues found in the research on this topic: 1. State control versus federal control. 2. Morality issue related to the idea that people should develop a work ethic rather than being weaned away from one. 3. The need to balance the federal budget. 4. Imposing time limits and work requirements. 6. Family cap so that no additional funds will be provided for additional births. 7. Withholding benefits for those who may be legal residents--demand for citizenship should be a requirement. 8. All benefits should be withheld from those who are here illegally to help reduce illegal immigration. 9. Benefits should be withheld from those who are subject
. . .
rent reflection of pressures upwardly through the state. The state and its bureaucracy act as transferring media, the formulators and executors of desires expressed by the pertinent interests.
The managerial state develops as the state and its government bureaucracy focus on identifying problems, developing solutions, and implementing those solutions: "The state and its policy apparatus intervene as disinterested solvers of common problems."
The fact that a government institutes this sort of program does not mean it should do so. The entitlement conception of distributive justice begins with John Locke, who says that we are all born with certain natural rights to life, liberty, and property. We are free to exercise these rights so long as doing so does not interfere with others, and we have the natural right to protect these three rights.
Robert Nozick also shows a strong commitment to prepolitical individual rights. He also recognizes that there are forces, including past injustices, which shape our holdings in society in various ways, raising the question of what ought to be done to rectify these injustices:
The general outlines of the theory of justice in holdings are that the holdings of a person are just if he is
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
John Rawls, Book Virtues, , Robert Nozick, John Locke, John Arthur, Jersey Prentice-Hall, welfare system, Newsweek June, transfer payments, University Press, Wadsworth Publishing, jersey prentice-hall 1996, upper saddle river, arthur ed, controversies john, theory justice, john arthur, distributive justice, morality moral, moral controversies john, controversies john arthur, natural rights, saddle river jersey, idea people,
Approximate Word count = 1562
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Republican Welfare Plan
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
