Philosophy Essay
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The cognitive theory of emotion comes under fire in Cheshire CalhounÆs Cognitive Emotions? In this essay, Calhoun (p. 239) maintains that cognitive theories of emotion that are based on a connection between emotion and ôrelevant beliefsö are invalid. Calhoun (p. 237) discusses two kinds of cognitivism that he undermines, ôpatchworkö and ôunityö accounts. In both of these accounts, the author argues that beliefs are associated with many other concepts, from feelings and assessment to behavior and desires. Patchwork accounts are either ôlogico-linguisticö or ôontologicalö (Calhoun, p. 237). The logico-linguistic account views beliefs as partial components of emotion and that ôascriptions of emotions entail ascriptions of certain sorts of beliefs (Solomon, p. 237). Ontological accounts go even further by proclaiming that ôbeliefs are ingredients of emotionö (Calhoun, p. 237). Unity theories of cognitive emotion do not try to deconstruct emotion into non-emotion elements, but they do maintain that beliefs take on uniquely emotional qualities. Even so, Calhoun claims that the unity theory radically transforms the concept of belief. As the author exclaims, ôHow can a physiological disturbance be a belief? Are not these, logically and ontologically, distinct categories?ö (Calhoun, p. 238). In short, patchwork theories of emotion reject the idea that emotional beliefs are any different than any other kind of belief. Neither of these theories is able
. . .
ellectual believing. This deconstruction of beliefs, intelligence and worldviews shows that the direct causal link between bdliefs and emotions offered by the constructivist is seriously flawed. There are too many variables associated with beliefs to suggest that they are the cause of emotions, especially as the case between the different arrivals at emotion that Carl and Tess experience in CalhounÆs exploration. As Calhoun (p. 240) ôThe cognitivist would like to deny brute emotions that lack an intelligible well-spring in belief.ö Cognitivists fall into this trap because it is virtually impossible for them to view human behavior and feeling as anything disconnected from logical, rational processes. Calhoun proves this denial may limit their ability to ever fully understand the nature of emotions.
Reference
Calhoun, C. (XXXX). Cognitive emotions? 236-247.
Philosophy Essay Two
In Robert SolomonÆs (p. 224) From Emotions and Choice, the author supports a cognitive theory of emotions wherein ôevaluative judgments play an essential role.ö In this essay, Solomon argues against the conventional explanation of emotions as feelings or affect. The author does admit the possibility that emotions may be paired with feelings but th
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Instead SolomonÆs, Cognitive Emotions, Main Street, Carl Tess, Emotions Choice, Philosophy Essay, XXXX Cognitive, Solomon XXXX, intellectual believing, Robert SolomonÆs, choose emotion, emotions choice, manner solomon, anger despair, views emotions, calhoun 237, emotion anger, cognitive emotion, rational assessment,
Approximate Word count = 1445
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Philosophy Essay
|