to a subject's leadership style, and a subject's self perceptions of her or his leadership style.
In the assessment of the subject's leadership style, the subject's self evaluation of his leadership style indicated that he was an S1 leader. This assessment meant that the subject perceived his leadership style as being strong on direction and weak on support. The subject's leadership style was not perceived in this same context by his immediate organizational superior, his associate on the same organizational hierarchy level as the subject, or his immediate organizational subordinates.
The subject's immediate organizational superior perceived the subject in a combined or dual S2 and S3 context. The S2
evaluation meant that the subject's immediate organizational superior perceived the subject's leadership style as strong on both direction and support, while the S3 evaluation meant that the subject's immediate organizational superior perceived the subject's leadership style
...